Skip to content
CryptoAcademy logo CryptoAcademy
Menu
Advanced Blockchain

51% attack

An attack where one party controls most of the network's mining power or stake and can rewrite recent history.

51% attack at a glance
Blocks are linked by hashes; editing one block breaks every link after it Block n-1 hash 9c1a…f4 valid Block n hash 0007…b2 edited by an attacker Block n+1 hash 41de…09 valid Block n+2 hash 77b0…aa valid prev hash ✗ attacker edits a value → block hash changes The integrity cascade 1. Editing a transaction in block n changes its Merkle root → changes the header hash. 2. Block n+1 stores the old hash → the link is broken and the chain from n+1 on is invalid. 3. To stay valid the attacker must re-mine every later block — faster than the network grows them.

In simple terms

With the majority of the work, an attacker can rebuild blocks faster than the honest network and reverse recent transactions — but cannot steal coins outright or invent new ones.

Analogy

A vote count where one party staffs most of the counting tables: they can recount to a preferred result, but cannot add voters who never showed up.

Going deeper

A majority can double-spend and censor, not counterfeit: signatures still protect other people's coins, and old confirmations stay buried under re-mined work. Real attacks have hit small PoW chains where rented hashrate exceeded the honest network.

Common mistake

Confusing "can reverse recent confirmations" with "can break the whole system" — deep history and foreign signatures stay safe.

Share this page

Send this link to a friend, or scan the QR code to open it on your phone.